Time Spent in Shelters
Compare the distributions of time spent in shelter for cats and dogs to note both similarities and differences:
Distributions are bimodal with relatively fat tails but they differ in how major modes compare to minor ones. As Wikipedia rightly notices "a bimodal distribution most commonly arises as a mixture of two different unimodal distributions" and dissecting data by admission and outcome types opens the door to further discovery:
If the former histogram used facets for separate plots for cats and dogs, the latter plot switched to dodged bars to pack more information into less space. Some interesting observations:
And then for dogs:
Distributions are bimodal with relatively fat tails but they differ in how major modes compare to minor ones. As Wikipedia rightly notices "a bimodal distribution most commonly arises as a mixture of two different unimodal distributions" and dissecting data by admission and outcome types opens the door to further discovery:
If the former histogram used facets for separate plots for cats and dogs, the latter plot switched to dodged bars to pack more information into less space. Some interesting observations:
- Confiscated admissions have distinctively different profile and peaks presumingly attributed to legal obligations to owners;
- Confiscated has distinct bimodal distributions when outcomes are either Returned to Owner or Transfer;
- Adoption times are similar for both cats and dogs;
- Most distributions have clear unimodal profiles specific to the types of admission and outcome that vary between dogs and cats in density;
- Adoption and to less degree Owner Surrender distributions are almost indistinguishable between cats and dogs.
Rendering the same data using density curve estimates lets us validate the differences and similarities observed:
The densities demonstrate striking similarity in Adoption and most differences in Euthanized outcome times.
Sankeys With Average Times
We already used Sankey diagrams to project flow from admission to discharge by total number of occurrences in each transition. This time we decided on novel approach to Sankeys when thickness reflects average time spent in shelter. First diagram is for cats:
And then for dogs:
The thinner the line the shorter average stay between admission and outcome it connects. And the larger vertical panel (admission or outcome) the longer it indicates an animal spends in shelter after admission or before discharge (on average and unweighted).
We begin with rather simple calculations - an estimates of chance of dying in shelter given animal satisfies certain condition. Plot below contains conditional probabilities for dogs (unless cats specified) not surviving in shelter given certain factor at the time of admission (intake categories):
Two health conditions stand out with the highest rates: untreatable and unmanageable, while another health condition contagious is present in 3 out of top 4 factors.
There is one more factor breed which has over 200 values just for dogs. Below we display chances of dying for the dog breeds with at least 100 recorded admissions:
Note that probability scale is different between last two plots. Surprisingly, breed Chow Chow took the top spot with Pit Bull Terrier breeds Staffordshire, Pit Bull, Am Pit Bull Terrier, and American Staffordshire close next.
Expected Chance of Not Surviving in Shelter
For the purpose of this analysis any outcome other than Died or Euthanized means animal survived to leave shelter alive (most with outcomes Adoption, Foster, Returned to Owner or Transfer). Remember that we also excluded dogs with intake type Dead on Arrival (see introduction).We begin with rather simple calculations - an estimates of chance of dying in shelter given animal satisfies certain condition. Plot below contains conditional probabilities for dogs (unless cats specified) not surviving in shelter given certain factor at the time of admission (intake categories):
There is one more factor breed which has over 200 values just for dogs. Below we display chances of dying for the dog breeds with at least 100 recorded admissions:
Survival Analysis
While applying classic survival analysis to animal shelter data presents certain challenges we apply the approach by ignoring few details. But any suggestions or comments how to improve are welcome. The survival function S(t) gives the probability that the subject (pet admitted to shelter) survives longer than time t.
In this case pets survived when discharged with any outcome other than Died or Euthanized. The time t is always in days since the day of admission and all animal records included in this analysis are for animals that were discharged (effectively eliminating both left and right censoring cases). Survival analysis accounts for censored data - those subjects with last known status alive and no later information available. In our case all animal records contain outcome and thus all discharged alive are censored at discharge date.
In this case pets survived when discharged with any outcome other than Died or Euthanized. The time t is always in days since the day of admission and all animal records included in this analysis are for animals that were discharged (effectively eliminating both left and right censoring cases). Survival analysis accounts for censored data - those subjects with last known status alive and no later information available. In our case all animal records contain outcome and thus all discharged alive are censored at discharge date.
Kaplan-Meier Estimator
Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimate is a non-parametric maximum likelihood estimate of the survival function, S(t). It measures the fraction of animals living for a certain number of days t after admission and produces a declining step function with drops (KM curve) that approximates the real survival function from data. Given single categorical factor we can observe and compare KM curves (univariate analysis) among multiple factor values. KM curves estimate and visualize survival chances in time just as survival functions: given time t what is probability that subject survives at least to that time or longer.
Cats vs. Dogs KM Curves
First we compare survival curves between cats and dogs:
The survival curve plot (top) is augmented with the bar chart of totals by categories and survival outcome (bottom) to give better understanding of underlying data. Survival chances for cats are never better than those and overall cats fare much worse than dogs - see bar chart above. Zooming in into the most critical first days after admission reveals more differences:
Day of admission is the worst for both but cats fare twice as bad with 25% lost right away. Days 4 and 5 are critical for dogs as their survival plummets on these days. After that survival rates stabilize and trend in similar pattern.
KM Curves by Dog Intake Types
To make further analysis more plausible we include only dog records from this point on. We also exclude pets admitted as Dead on Arrival or Euthanasia Requested since their outcomes are obvious and immediate.
Confiscated dogs survival chances are the best in first 10 days or so but then they quickly deteriorate crossing and diving below 2 other types after 2 weeks. The worst chances as expected belong to dogs surrendered by owner. And after 2 weeks all 3 curves cross to become less distinguishable.
KM Curves by Dog Origins
Dallas Animal Services also maintain origin field assigning it at admission with 3 most prevalent values being Field, Over the Counter, and Sweep. These are how survival curves differ depending on dog origin:
Again, significant shifts in survival chances happen after 5 days and then after 2-3 weeks when the fortunes of different origins turn around: after 5 days Over the Counter from the worst becomes 2d worst (or best) and then after 3 weeks the best. Both Field and Sweep drop after 5 days. In absolute numbers (shown in the bar plots) Field dogs survive the worst.
Health Conditions at Admission
Unhealthy animals have little chance to survive shelters as evident from the following:
No surprise that unhealthy animals survival is significntly below healthy ones. Also, dominant majority of dogs accepted are in unhealthy condition, which is both not surprising and unfortunate.
There is more information about unhealthy dogs available from shelter records: treatable vs. untreatable and contagious vs. non-contagious. Unfortunately, these values reside inside single field so the survival curves include combinations of the health factors:
It clearly shows how each health factor reduces survival chances: from Healthy to Treatable Rehabilitable to Treatable Manageable to Unhealthy Untreatable to finally Unhealthy Untreatable Contagious.
If we extract and analyze each health factor (ignoring the rest) then these relationships become more apparent:
Still having a dog microchipped will almost certainly keep survival chances higher.
Top 4 breeds - Pit Bull, Labrador Retriever, Chihuahua, and German Shepherd - account for almost 60% of all admissions with next breed - Cairn Terrier - dropping to just under 3%. The survival curves for these 5 breeds contain almost 2/3 of all dogs admitted to Dallas shelters:
Pit Bull's suffer the worst survival rate of the 5 most admitted breeds. It drops to below 50% survival rate after just over a week at shelter. Labrador and German Shepherd get 50% some time into 3 week period. Smaller breeds last much better as evident from Chihuahua and Cairn Terrier curves.
It turns out there are more breeds closely related to Pit Bull: American Staff, Am Pit Bull Ter, and Staffordshire:
Similar pattern for three of four breeds from the group sharply differ from the 4th - American Staffordshire for reason(s) beyond this analysis.
No surprise that unhealthy animals survival is significntly below healthy ones. Also, dominant majority of dogs accepted are in unhealthy condition, which is both not surprising and unfortunate.
There is more information about unhealthy dogs available from shelter records: treatable vs. untreatable and contagious vs. non-contagious. Unfortunately, these values reside inside single field so the survival curves include combinations of the health factors:
It clearly shows how each health factor reduces survival chances: from Healthy to Treatable Rehabilitable to Treatable Manageable to Unhealthy Untreatable to finally Unhealthy Untreatable Contagious.
If we extract and analyze each health factor (ignoring the rest) then these relationships become more apparent:
Survival of Dogs with Chips
As of June 17, 2017, all dogs and cats four months and older in the city of Dallas must be microchipped. This relatively new regulation will likely change both the share of chipped dogs in Dallas and survival curves as observed below from 2015 through October 2017:
Still having a dog microchipped will almost certainly keep survival chances higher.
Dog Breeds
Dallas shelters admitted dogs of over 200 different breeds from 2015 through 2017. Among them 56 breeds appeared 100 times or more (over 95% of all admissions):
Top 4 breeds - Pit Bull, Labrador Retriever, Chihuahua, and German Shepherd - account for almost 60% of all admissions with next breed - Cairn Terrier - dropping to just under 3%. The survival curves for these 5 breeds contain almost 2/3 of all dogs admitted to Dallas shelters:
It turns out there are more breeds closely related to Pit Bull: American Staff, Am Pit Bull Ter, and Staffordshire:
Similar pattern for three of four breeds from the group sharply differ from the 4th - American Staffordshire for reason(s) beyond this analysis.
